Re: [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes

Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:44:02PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag 03 August 2007 schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> > It's certainly possible to do that, but it's also possible to have a 
> > userspace solution that whitelists devices. The question is whether the 
> > default kernel behaviour should be "Save power, but potentially break 
> > some of my devices" or "Don't break my devices, but use some more 
> > powre".
> 
> If both options have drawbacks, IMHO we follow the standard, which
> says that devices must support suspension.

Except that lots of hardware doesn't follow the standard in this 
respect, otherwise we wouldn't be having this discussion. Personally, I 
think "Will break an unknown number of devices" is a significantly 
larger drawback than "Will consume a small quantity of additional 
power".

-- 
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.