Re: Change to ed_halted in ohci-q.c
David Brownell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 13 August 2007, Alan Stern wrote: > The idea is that when an URB gets an error, there's no need to put all > the TDs after the one that failed through the done list. They can be > removed right away, and then the URB can be given back as soon as the > failed TD is reached. I'm not sure I see the point of this change though. Was there some problem with how it worked before? It'd be rare to have more than two TDs per URB in any case. I don't recall exactly how that code ended up that way, but I expect the intent was to have a single "known to work" path through which TDs get reclaimed. - Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel