Re: Change to ed_halted in ohci-q.c

David Brownell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 13 August 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
> The idea is that when an URB gets an error, there's no need to put all 
> the TDs after the one that failed through the done list.  They can be 
> removed right away, and then the URB can be given back as soon as the 
> failed TD is reached.

I'm not sure I see the point of this change though.  Was
there some problem with how it worked before?  It'd be
rare to have more than two TDs per URB in any case.

I don't recall exactly how that code ended up that way,
but I expect the intent was to have a single "known to
work" path through which TDs get reclaimed.

- Dave


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.