Re: [PATCH v4] Re: another unusual flag for a really limited device
Doug Maxey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:02:26 EST, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Doug Maxey wrote: > > > This version folds in Alan's example. > > > > ++doug > > --- > > From f644b337771374178d5585bcedf8153f5b45f2d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Doug Maxey <[email protected]> > > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:42:42 -0600 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] usb-storage: limit devices that cannot handle 32k transfers > > > > When a device cannot handle the smallest previously limited transfer > > size (64 blocks) without stalling, limit the device to the amount of > > packets that fit in a platform native page. > > > > The lowest possible limit is PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, so if the device is ever > > used on a platform that has larger than 8K pages, you lose unless you > > can convince the device firmware folks to fix the issue. > > > > Cc: Mathew Dharm <[email protected]> > > Cc: Alan Stern <[email protected]> > > Cc: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Doug Maxey <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[email protected]> > Is there any chance to consider this a bug fix for 2.6.24? ++doug ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel