Re: Are regular smart tests safe? And smart logs capacity, location

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The SMART tests are read only, so in and of themselves, they are safe.
However, if there is a physical problem with the drive and/or it is
failing, running it more is a bad idea. That is why I ALWAYS look at the
attributes first.

Strange sounds = backup data now. Only after the data is safe, can you
think about running tests.

> Hi!
>
> I'm curious about correlation between regular SMART tests (long and
> short) and disk health. When smart tests are running HDD emits strange
> sounds, and I do not know what is going on inside HDD, maybe only vendor
> does. Does it reduce hdd health? Do you have such statistics?
>
> My disks pass 4 short and 1 long test per month, so smart logs are
> getting bigger with 5 strings every month. Are this logs stored on hdd,
> or somewhere on my PC? If they are stored on disk, how much regular disk
> can store (about 100, about 1000?)?
>
> Kind regards,
> Yan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Smartmontools-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.