Re: [WBEL-devel] Re: [WBEL-devel] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82369

On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 21:10 -0500, William Hooper wrote:
> bishop said:
> > Folks,
> >
> >
> >> /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h-177-#include <openssl/x509.h>
> >> /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h-178-#endif
> >> /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:179:#include <openssl/kssl.h>
> >> /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h-180-#include <openssl/safestack.h>
> >> /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h-181-#include <openssl/symhacks.h>
> >>
> >
> > Any chance of a fix for this in WB?
> >
> 
> The qoal of WBEL is to be true to RHEL.  The bug is closed as WONTFIX for
> RHEL (well phoebe anyway) so it would be the same for WBEL.
> 
Especially for something like this ... IMHO building files _HAS_TO_BE_
the same between WBEL and RHEL.  It would not be good to have something
build on RHEL and not build in WBEL, or visa versa.
-- 
Johnny Hughes
<http://www.HughesJR.com/>