Re: asdf recompilation trigger problem

Miles Egan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.cclan.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 13:05, Daniel Barlow wrote:
> Miles Egan <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > The issue is that, when gentoo "merges" (installs) the sbcl package, it
> > sets all the file timestamps to the same value, which triggers this
> > clause (I think):
> >
> >        (and
> >         (every #'probe-file out-files)
> >         (> (apply #'min (mapcar #'file-write-date out-files))
> >            (apply #'max (mapcar #'file-write-date in-files)) ))))))
> 
> Oh bah.  There are issues involved with fast machines and compilations
> that take less than a second.  I can't actually remember what the
> effect of > versus >= is, but I do remember thinking about it.
> 
> Of course, it's entirely possible I got the wrong answer last time and
> >= is the better comparison.  But, as I say, actual thought required.

I seem to always run into this problem with make & nfs mounts too. 
Annoying.

For now I'm just touching all the fasl files in a postinstall script. 
Hacky, but it works.

-- 
Miles Egan <[email protected]>
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+eOo+U4Jq/wH1PVERAvIKAJ9o5MbkN+h3eNSuRoKt+VVk9afoHACeINj9
NQEATpUDpASatdbTZgywMoo=
=DCg/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.