Re: asdf recompilation trigger problem
Miles Egan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 13:05, Daniel Barlow wrote: > Miles Egan <[email protected]> writes: > > > The issue is that, when gentoo "merges" (installs) the sbcl package, it > > sets all the file timestamps to the same value, which triggers this > > clause (I think): > > > > (and > > (every #'probe-file out-files) > > (> (apply #'min (mapcar #'file-write-date out-files)) > > (apply #'max (mapcar #'file-write-date in-files)) )))))) > > Oh bah. There are issues involved with fast machines and compilations > that take less than a second. I can't actually remember what the > effect of > versus >= is, but I do remember thinking about it. > > Of course, it's entirely possible I got the wrong answer last time and > >= is the better comparison. But, as I say, actual thought required. I seem to always run into this problem with make & nfs mounts too. Annoying. For now I'm just touching all the fasl files in a postinstall script. Hacky, but it works. -- Miles Egan <[email protected]>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+eOo+U4Jq/wH1PVERAvIKAJ9o5MbkN+h3eNSuRoKt+VVk9afoHACeINj9 NQEATpUDpASatdbTZgywMoo= =DCg/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----