Re: asdf recompilation trigger problem

Daniel Barlow <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.cclan.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Miles Egan <[email protected]> writes:

> The issue is that, when gentoo "merges" (installs) the sbcl package, it
> sets all the file timestamps to the same value, which triggers this
> clause (I think):
>
>        (and
>         (every #'probe-file out-files)
>         (> (apply #'min (mapcar #'file-write-date out-files))
>            (apply #'max (mapcar #'file-write-date in-files)) ))))))

Oh bah.  There are issues involved with fast machines and compilations
that take less than a second.  I can't actually remember what the
effect of > versus >= is, but I do remember thinking about it.

Of course, it's entirely possible I got the wrong answer last time and
>= is the better comparison.  But, as I say, actual thought required.


-dan

-- 

   http://www.cliki.net/ - Link farm for free CL-on-Unix resources 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? 
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. 
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.