Re: asdf recompilation trigger problem
Daniel Barlow <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Miles Egan <[email protected]> writes: > The issue is that, when gentoo "merges" (installs) the sbcl package, it > sets all the file timestamps to the same value, which triggers this > clause (I think): > > (and > (every #'probe-file out-files) > (> (apply #'min (mapcar #'file-write-date out-files)) > (apply #'max (mapcar #'file-write-date in-files)) )))))) Oh bah. There are issues involved with fast machines and compilations that take less than a second. I can't actually remember what the effect of > versus >= is, but I do remember thinking about it. Of course, it's entirely possible I got the wrong answer last time and >= is the better comparison. But, as I say, actual thought required. -dan -- http://www.cliki.net/ - Link farm for free CL-on-Unix resources ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en