Re: asdf test-op implementation?
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: > I've written a little test suite, and I was going to write a little > ASDF integration for the suite. Just as I was about to define an > asdf::test-op for the suite, I found that there's already one > there... Only it's implementation isn't. Would there be any objection > to me hijacking this test-op? Or would that be unwise and generally > frowned upon? I think the idea is that one defines (defmethod asdf:perform ((o asdf:test-op) (s (eql (find-system :<your-system>)))) <call-your-testing-harness>) ... in other words, that's what it's there for. Cheers, Christophe -- http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/ +44 1223 510 299/+44 7729 383 757 (set-pprint-dispatch 'number (lambda (s o) (declare (special b)) (format s b))) (defvar b "~&Just another Lisp hacker~%") (pprint #36rJesusCollegeCambridge) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click