| Newsgroups |
gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Hmmm, that's not quite the usage I had in mind. I think I'll define my
own test operation then.
Thanks!
Sunil
Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> [email protected] writes:
>
>
>>I've written a little test suite, and I was going to write a little
>>ASDF integration for the suite. Just as I was about to define an
>>asdf::test-op for the suite, I found that there's already one
>>there... Only it's implementation isn't. Would there be any objection
>>to me hijacking this test-op? Or would that be unwise and generally
>>frowned upon?
>
>
> I think the idea is that one defines
> (defmethod asdf:perform
> ((o asdf:test-op) (s (eql (find-system :<your-system>))))
> <call-your-testing-harness>)
> ... in other words, that's what it's there for.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christophe
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click