[ clisp-Bugs-3554023 ] special operators without a corresponding macro definition.

Bugs item #3554023, was opened at 2012-08-03 06:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by informatimago
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3554023&group_id=1355

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: clisp
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago)
Assigned to: Bruno Haible (haible)
Summary: special operators without a corresponding macro definition.

Initial Comment:


The following special operators don't have a corresponding macro definition.

EXT:COMPILER-LET
 SYSTEM::FUNCTION-MACRO-LET

While the standard doesn't specify anything for special operators not in the CL package, it would still be nice if they followed the same rule as for CL macros implemented as special operators:

3.1.2.1.2.2 Macro Forms
An implementation is free to implement any macro operator as a special operator, 
but only if an equivalent definition of the macro is also provided. 

since this would ensure that portable code walkers can be written.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3554023&group_id=1355

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
clisp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel