Re: sourceforge miseries
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:49:22 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5131874.em3cE5a31s@omega> |
Hi Sam, > Does savannah or SF support repo synchronization? > (push to either and the other one automatically gets the patch) For the git side, yes. 1) It is possible to install server-side git hooks on savannah (although it may require help from Jim Meyering or the site admins to do so). 2) There is a coreutils git mirror on github, and it is very up-to-date. For the hg side, I don't know. Note that for continuous integration, you don't need repo synchronization: it is sufficient to do "git pull" / "hg pull --update" once a day. > At any rate, do you also want to move the bug tracker? mailing list? Not at the moment. For the mailing lists, such a move can be considered later. Advertisements in a mail footer are silly. For the bug tracker, sourceforge is currently OK (now that we have learned how to use ``` ... ``` and `...`). > Yeah, but that bug tracker sucks big time. > Even SF is better. The rich text functionality in savannah's tracker is a bit poor, yes. On the other hand, I like the categorization / sorting interface. > I am not too familiar with gitlab, but its tracker appears to be more > modern. Surely everything Gitlab has is modern. The worry I have with Gitlab is whether it will remain easy-to-use and easy-to-administrate 10 years from now. Bruno ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel