Re: sourceforge miseries
Jean Louis <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:25:06 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 12:27:59PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > I moved from cons.org to SF 18 years ago based on similar hardships. > I understand your frustration ;-( > > Now that git has clearly won against mercurial, I think any repo move > should include switching to git - no reason to stick with obsolete tech. > > > b) Convert it to git and move it to savannah.gnu.org. > > c) Convert it to git and move it to gitlab.com. > > why not d) github.com? and why not simply fire up your own Gitlab instance on DigitalOcean.com? I mean how hard is that one? There are many reasons against github.com: - CLISP is free software, hosted on non-free software, makes no sense for free software supporters. Github is not free software. Gitlab is. Install Gitlab for you yourself, easy. - Decentralization. What is the point of Internet if you need to depend on github? Why not have your own server. If money is needed I can donate. Gitlab is self-hosted. - Github runs non-free software on their website, so why push users into running non-free software (Javascript) to get free software, make no sense. I would also say that plethora of mailing lists are hosted with GNU.org http://lists.gnu.org/ and that CLISP mailing list would be great there, as one can download all archives down and there is web interface to browse there. And all mail can be converted into it easily. Jean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel