Re: defsystem vs asdf

> * Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]> [2005-08-16 16:20:34 -0400]:
>
>>
>> I would much rather have one de-facto standard SDF than two similar but
>> incompatible ones.
>
> Of course.  The right way to go ahead and do this is to write up a
> spec first and then to go ahead and re-implement.

I don't want to re-implement anything.
I want to use one of the two existing facilities.

> All in all I have been debating myself whether to switch to ASDF.

that does it.

> Somehow, I just haven't.  Plus, I have some semi-working code for
> MK:DEFSYSTEM 5.0 that I have been using locally, but I am not
> satisfied with that either and time is a tyrant.

it appears that defsystem 3 is frozen and defsystem 4 is vaporware.
now you are saying that you have v5?!


-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.savegushkatif.org> <http://ffii.org/> <http://truepeace.org>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/>
"Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon."	-Alan Perlis



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf