Re: fault-join-target-slot assumes that :target-slot names a class

Aleksandar Bakic wrote:
> It seems that fault-join-target-slot, in the case of :immediate retrieval,
> assumes that :target-slot, in addition to naming a slot, names its class.
> Namely, it calls find-class on it. Hence, the slot should be named after the
> class, which seems incorrect.

Hi Alek,

My memory on this is quite rusty. It's been a few years since I worked
on this and, personally, I don't use the object-oriented joins. I
wrote enough code to the pass the examples in the CommonSQL
documentation. I wouldn't be surprised if there were some
inconsistencies in edge cases like you mentioned.

> PS. Does item-elt require its own key, in general? (I do not need it, but am
> not sure if clsql expects one for any reason.)

Sorry, I can't answer this without reviewing some code which I don't
currently have the time to do.

Kevin