Re: Need for testing [was Re: one more time.lisp patch]

Aleksandar Bakic wrote:
> Since I am not quite sure what bugs and what new features you mean, let me add:
> As for the usec stuff, nothing there is new; there is a function that returns
> usec as the first value, so no callers may ignore it. As for new features, I
> agree that it would be good to provide at least unit tests, which also show how
> the features are used. I hope that's close to what you meant.

Hi Alex,

I agree that your patch was a straightforward bug fix. As for the bugs
and new features, I was referring to the original usec patch that
added usec time support to accomodate postgresql's time results. But,
which had bugs that which required 4-5 subsequent patches from other
folks to fix.

Kevin

> 
> 	
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> CLSQL-Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.b9.com/mailman/listinfo/clsql-devel
-- 
Kevin Rosenberg
kevin-HJRc7zDS/[email protected]