Re: LIST-TABLES problem on LispWorks
"Bill Atkins" <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:47:01 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clsql.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/13/06, Kevin Rosenberg <kevin-HJRc7zDS/[email protected]> wrote: > Bill Atkins wrote: > > I got the UFFI tests to pass by changing ensure-char-storable in > > uffi/src/objects.lisp to: > > > > (defmacro ensure-char-storable (obj) > > #+(or digitool (and lispworks (not lispworks5.0))) obj > > #+(or lispworks allegro lispworks5.0 cmu sbcl scl openmcl) `(char-code > > ,obj)) > > I reviewed the function. Is the below what you meant? Otherwise, in > your code, lispworks 4.4 and below would be selected in both reader > conditionals. > > (defmacro ensure-char-storable (obj) > #+(or digitool (and lispworks (not lispworks5.0))) obj > #+(or lispworks5.0 allegro cmu sbcl scl openmcl) `(char-code ,obj)) Yes, my mistake. > Assuming that Lispworks intended to make this change in their FFI, it > will be somewhat problematic in the future since each new version of > lispworks will require being added to the lispworks5.0 conditionals. > > Does you version also define lispworks5? If so, at least that should > be present in all future 5.x releases and would be better than > lispworks5.0, assuming Lispworks FFI doesn't change again. It does. I was looking for :lispworks5 originally and must have missed it. > > However, the CLSQL problem still exists. I cleaned out all my fasls, > > did a make clean in the clsql/uffi directory, and rebuilt, but I still > > get the same output from LIST-TABLES. I'll let you know if I make > > any progress on the CLSQL problem. > > All the foreign string conversion for all backends takes place in > uffi/clsql-uffi.lisp in the function CONVERT-RAW-FIELD. As you can > see, for strings that function invokes UFFI:CONVERT-FROM-FOREIGN-STRING. > > -- > Kevin Rosenberg > [email protected] > -- Bill Atkins