Re: LIST-TABLES problem on LispWorks

Bill Atkins wrote:
> Yes, my mistake.

Thanks for confirming, your help with porting to LW5 is much appreciated.

> It does.  I was looking for :lispworks5 originally and must have missed it.

Very good, I'll incorporate the change in UFFI with the :lispworks5
item in *features*. But, I'll hold off releasing a new version of
UFFI/CLSQL until you have some time to look at the string conversion.

Thanks again for the help.

-- 
Kevin Rosenberg
[email protected]