Re: RFC rampage

Nathan Froyd <[email protected]> writes:

> Well, they had (2425/2426 for vCards, 2445 for iCalendar--a revision
> of vCalendars) and so I've set about changing things to be conformant
> with those standards.

Ah, neat!  I had been thinking about those too.  Perhaps (I have server
space) we could create an "RFCs implemented in Common Lisp" page and
perhaps we could decide on some common grounds on how to write the
packages (I'm thinking of documentation, tests, defsystem - I currently
use ASDF - and continuable conditions).

Provided that these RFC implementations are reasonably good, it should
be fairly easy, well, easier, to implement applications (such as the
ones mentioned by Miles) on top of them.  An HTTP implementation would
be very convenient.

> Sadly, the machine on which I develop the code does not currently have
> access to the 'net; it will in about a month or so, at which point
> I'll be more than happy to share the code with anybody who wants to
> see.

If nothing else, I'd love to see your code.

Erik.