Re: Re: RFC rampage

On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 11:14, Erik Enge wrote:
> Nathan Froyd <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Well, they had (2425/2426 for vCards, 2445 for iCalendar--a revision
> > of vCalendars) and so I've set about changing things to be conformant
> > with those standards.
> 
> Ah, neat!  I had been thinking about those too.  Perhaps (I have server
> space) we could create an "RFCs implemented in Common Lisp" page and
> perhaps we could decide on some common grounds on how to write the
> packages (I'm thinking of documentation, tests, defsystem - I currently
> use ASDF - and continuable conditions).

It would be great if they worked together, I agree.  A page to track the
status of each of the modules sounds like a good idea to me.

> Provided that these RFC implementations are reasonably good, it should
> be fairly easy, well, easier, to implement applications (such as the
> ones mentioned by Miles) on top of them.  An HTTP implementation would
> be very convenient.

Dan Barlow's Araneida is a pretty decent HTTP server.  I'm using it as
the basis of an xml-rpc/blog server.

-- 
Miles Egan <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Clump mailing list
[email protected]
http://manly.caddr.com/mailman/listinfo/clump

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+5ifKU4Jq/wH1PVERAny+AJ40SjrJDthI+ZfNO1YixDHHj7MOygCfWndZ
OKT9slr6lmUpTM3BEEqNrQw=
=YeCv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----