Delivering Lisp applications [was: Re: [email protected]]
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Dec 2003 22:11:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clump |
|---|---|
| Organization | Paolo Amoroso - Milano, ITALY |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Barlow writes: > Personally I would like to see a little more discussion on the Clump > list. While the ethos that each post should really be about Actual > Code is great, I don't think that it has to require a project release > announcement every time. Let's try, hoping not to drift off-topic. I would like to start a discussion about all issues related to Lisp application delivery. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: - deployment to user machines (from install scripts to things like vn-cCLan/asdf-install, but for "executable" applications and not source code) - "executable" generation/packaging (e.g. how to best package together, say, a Lisp world plus all the auxiliary binaries/scripts) - robustness (designing Lisp applications so that they don't blow into Joe User's face, for appropriate values of not blowing into the user's face: should we never allow the application to enter the debugger? what if it does enter the debugger? can/should we trap all user interrupts and similar actions?) - GUIs (when is a GUI based on CLIM acceptable/adequate (I'm specifically interested in CLIM)? when it's not? what about UIs based on web browsers?) Although I'm personally interested in end user applications under Unix, I think good ideas can come from discussions of other kinds of software--e.g. servers--for different operating systems. Paolo -- Why Lisp? http://alu.cliki.net/RtL%20Highlight%20Film