Re: Re: xmls 0.2 released
Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clump |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 10:09 PM, Erik Enge wrote: > Rudi Schlatte <[email protected]> writes: > >> So, an xml-rpc library will probably turn up in paserve/contrib within >> a month or so. > > Any chance of making this a standalone library (that is, one that does > not depend on acl-compat or paserve)? > > Erik. Well, my version ( http://homepage.mac.com/svc/xml-rpc/readme.html ) is completely standalone, for both the client and the server part (you need the XML parser of course, but only the functional event interface part, not any of the dom parts). The amont of non-standard CL code is minimal (some minimal networking and multiprocessing). There are however some advantages to paserve and acl-compat: more portable, better tested, more 'pro' HTTP communication. But if you just need XML-RPC, then maybe there is some overkill to paserve (but more in terms of complexity than resource consumption, IMHO). Sven