Re: Re: xmls 0.2 released

Miles Egan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.clump
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 13:19, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> There are however some advantages to paserve and acl-compat: more 
> portable, better tested, more 'pro' HTTP communication. But if you just 
> need XML-RPC, then maybe there is some overkill to paserve (but more in 
> terms of complexity than resource consumption, IMHO).

It's definitely nice to have an xml-rpc library that isn't tied to any
particular http server.

-- 
Miles Egan <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Clump mailing list
[email protected]
http://manly.caddr.com/mailman/listinfo/clump
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+6OLhU4Jq/wH1PVERAvNDAKCDTZSYx6OS1995vuJluT2/V416oQCfduN4
l1KFqgyKr7FgPpvbWRCwwDc=
=OHv9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.