Re: Double version control in /custom/bin: _darcs and RCS?
Stelian Ionescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1307308231.8986.1.camel@cathai> |
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 23:04 +0200, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > There seems to be double version control applied to /custom/bin, since > there are 2 VC system admin directories. > > Which one do we choose? > > RCS is file-based, but good enough for our purpose, I'd say, > especially since most of the files we're version-controlling are > stand-alone. > > > RCS then? And in /custom Hans initialized a git repository :D I much prefer git to those other two -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib _______________________________________________ clo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clo-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk3r8McACgkQjWsER8+9ASWemwCfXNxlTa4o5fTk3HgI9Y258GY6 BH4AmQE2ILpgViV4+2xV1QQWyVmRkfcI =7+vT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----