RE: [PATCH 1/1] fport_print: handle ttyname ENODEV

> It’s simply the case that SCM_SYSCALL is slightly the wrong tool here,
> so a slight variant is needed.

>Good point.  How about this: […]

That’s it.

I would add a comment “// we don’t use SCM_SYSCALL, so we can keep the async tick outside the lock” (or worded differently ofc).

Best regards,
Maxime Devos