RE: [PATCH 1/1] fport_print: handle ttyname ENODEV
Rob Browning <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.guile.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Maxime Devos <[email protected]> writes: > That’s it. > > I would add a comment “// we don’t use SCM_SYSCALL, so we can keep the > async tick outside the lock” (or worded differently ofc). Plausible, though as a result of this I'm now a bit wary of SCM_SYSCALL. If I get time, I might poke around a bit and see if the thing we've attempted to fix here might be more widespread. Thanks again -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4