Re: Ilisp key binding changes (Option #2) - Please Review

Edi Weitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.ilisp.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Clementson, Bill" <[email protected]> writes:

> > The new bindings are described in detail at:
> > http://home.attbi.com/~bc19191/ilisp-keybindings.htm#Summary%2
> > 0of%20New%20FSF%20Key%20Bindings-Option#2
> 
> I've received feedback on c.l.l. that people who use ilisp on
> terminals can't always enter shifed characters (e.g. "A", "B",
> etc). So I've decided to revise the proposed bindings (again) to
> eliminate all shifted characters.
> 
> Incidentally, does anyone have a list of what characters are ALWAYS
> present on terminals?

The GNU Emacs Manual (13th edition, printed version) I have here says:

  "On ASCII terminals, there are only 32 possible control
   characters. These are the control variants of letters and
   `@[]\^_'. In addition, the shift key is meaningless with control
   characters: C-a and C-A are the same character, and Emacs cannot
   distinguish them."

But let me re-iterate what someone else has said on c.l.l: Some of
these non-letter characters are very hard to type for localized
keyboards, e.g. on my German keyboard {[]}\|@ can only be reached by
pressing the right ALT key ("AltGr") together with another key. I
guess this is about the same for most European keyboard variants.

I have used US keyboards from time to time because they're much easier
to use for programming work but I currently use a German keyboard
again because I had to write much (German) documentation and thus made
heavy use of the umlauts.

So, I think you'll have to find a balance between the needs of
terminal users and the needs of users of localized keyboards. I,
personally, never use Emacs over a terminal line... :)

Thank you very very much for the enormous amount of work you put into
this. I'm one of those who use only a small percentage of what ILISP
has to offer and one of the reasons is that I haven't taken the time
yet to learn the keybindings. Your effort will be a very good reason
for me to finally do it!

Thanks,
Edi.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.