Re: Any ilisp rpm files?
"A. F. Smith" <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.ilisp.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There's only one problem with your suggestion. I don't know how to use xemacs yet. Like I said in my very first post, I am trying to get xemacs and cmucl set up so I can use them to learn common lisp and xemacs. Also, it should be clear by my lengths that I have gone through that ilisp is not included in the mandrake rpms. I really do not understand the resistance to having ilisp rpms available for download. They are by far the easiest way to get ilisp installed into Mandrake and Red Hat systems. Why make people jusmp through unnecessary hoops when from this obvious example it's apparent that a good deal of the hoop-jumping ends with ilisp uninstalled on the target system and much time for both the person trying to set-up their system and the person who is trying to help them wasted. I've now been trying to get CMUCL environment working with an editor for more than a month. Three weeks of hoop jumping with all the various combinations of CMUCL compiler files ended with a 5 minute .rpm installation. Trying to get ilisp working has now stretched out more than a week with an answer no closer. This is not an efficient use of time. Creating the rpms would take one of you very little time, and would take me a couple of minutes to get installed. Instead, I'm still sitting here with no way to use xemacs and CMUCL together. --- [email protected] wrote: > > A. F. Smith writes: > > Are there any ilisp .rpm files around for > downloading? > > > > If not, it seems like a reasonable way for ilisp > to > > reach a greater potential user base. > > > > I believe ilisp is included in the XEMACS rpms that > you can get from > Mandrake. At any rate, rpmifying is unnecessary for > Xemacs, since > Xemacs has its own package manager for emacs-lisp > packages. If you're > maintaining an xemacs install, you should use that > package manager (in > the Options menu), instead of rpms (which are > updated far less > frequently). > > If you're not using xemacs (here comes the > flamebait), you should! > > R > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390