Re: Upcoming Lisa work

"David Young" <[email protected]> writes:

> I'm going to be working on Lisa a bit for awhile (occasionally). Initially I
> had considered adding backward-chaining to the project, but I've decided
> against that for the time being. Here's what I'll be doing:

I don't currently have a need for a backward chaining system, but I'm
curious about your decision to delay its implementation.  Is it
because of time constraints or because of technical reasons?


> This will probably constitute Lisa 3.0. If you have any other suggestions,
> post here and I'll consider them. Thanks.

Sounds great.


Paolo
-- 
Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642