Re: Porting Matlisp?
Raymond Toy <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:28:24 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.matlisp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Neuss <[email protected]> writes: Nicolas> Hello, Nicolas> I would like to ask how difficult you would consider porting Matlisp to Nicolas> other platforms than ACL or CMUCL. Especially SBCL (and maybe CLISP) are Nicolas> interesting for me now. SBCL should not be hard, but I haven't tried. Clisp is doable, but there will be a speed penalty, I think, because you can't directly access Clisp's internal array layout. Thus, every matrix operation will do a copy in and copy out. But perhaps that's still a win for Clisp. In terms of porting, I think you only need to update the FFI code to do the right thing for your desired platform. Ray