Re: Fwd: Intel native MCL

My biggest wish for CCL is the stepper. Because CCL doesn't have an
evaluator as MCL did, it might be difficult. An evaluator for CCL
would also be nice for other debugging reasons, but the stepper is the
big thing.

Henry


On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Alexander Repenning
<[email protected]> wrote:
> We - several people - =A0are using the CCL IDE on a regular basis and fin=
d it
> to be quite usable. To be sure, there is a list of Fred goodies that we a=
re
> still missing. I think the CCL IDE has reached, barely, the good enough
> threshold to develop real code. The demise of MCL on OS X Lion may actual=
ly
> have one good effect which is to set the definitive signal that it is time
> to let go of MCL. As a consequence, some good IDE hacking energy may be
> channeled into CCL where, I think, it should go. In other words, CCL IDE
> development may now actually accelerate. Perhaps this is a good thing.
> best, =A0Alex
>
> Prof. Alexander Repenning
>
> University of Colorado
>
> Computer Science Department
>
> Boulder, CO 80309-430
>
> vCard: http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~ralex/AlexanderRepenning.vcf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> info-mcl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl
>
>
_______________________________________________
info-mcl mailing list
[email protected]
http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl