Re: Fwd: Intel native MCL

Hey Henry, whatever happened to the Common Eval idea?  A Common Lisp
evaluator written in Common Lisp seems like such a great idea.

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Henry Lieberman <[email protected]> wrot=
e:
> My biggest wish for CCL is the stepper. Because CCL doesn't have an
> evaluator as MCL did, it might be difficult. An evaluator for CCL
> would also be nice for other debugging reasons, but the stepper is the
> big thing.
>
> Henry
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Alexander Repenning
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We - several people - =A0are using the CCL IDE on a regular basis and fi=
nd it
>> to be quite usable. To be sure, there is a list of Fred goodies that we =
are
>> still missing. I think the CCL IDE has reached, barely, the good enough
>> threshold to develop real code. The demise of MCL on OS X Lion may actua=
lly
>> have one good effect which is to set the definitive signal that it is ti=
me
>> to let go of MCL. As a consequence, some good IDE hacking energy may be
>> channeled into CCL where, I think, it should go. In other words, CCL IDE
>> development may now actually accelerate. Perhaps this is a good thing.
>> best, =A0Alex
>>
>> Prof. Alexander Repenning
>>
>> University of Colorado
>>
>> Computer Science Department
>>
>> Boulder, CO 80309-430
>>
>> vCard: http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~ralex/AlexanderRepenning.vcf
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> info-mcl mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> info-mcl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl
>
_______________________________________________
info-mcl mailing list
[email protected]
http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl