RE: Hosting of the cookbook
MJ Ray <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.schematics |
|---|---|
| Organization | Very poor |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2004-04-20 07:26:13 +0100 Anton van Straaten <[email protected]> wrote: > I've started a page listing some of the infrastructure items we've > discussed > so far, at: > http://shizuku.appsolutions.com/twiki/bin/view/Cookbook/AdminOverview Now I don't know which Cookbook wiki I am supposed to be using: is this the one at webhop too? > There's not a "How to Use Twiki" for authors yet, but the entire > TWiki docs > are there for the browsing. This is quite a problem. I have been using wikis since the c2.com one, but I do not know TWiki and it does not seem very wiki-like, with new obfuscating jargon (topics?) and markup. Aren't wikis meant to be simple? Needing to learn Twiki seems another barrier to entry. > Re annotations, I've added a topic called AdminAnnotationProposal > which > describes a way we could integrate annotations with the current > cookbook > design, if we want to. It sounds very complicated and lots of perl hacking. If you are confident of being able to do it, I'll take your word for it. >> The cookbook pages at >> schematics.sf.net makes no reference to the wiki edition; once you >> find schematics.webhop.net, the author guide is apparently incomplete >> on key topics like creating recipes and editing existing ones; and >> the >> mailing list has contradictory messages about what is going on. > None of this is targeted at anyone other than those of us setting up > the > system, at this point. Everyone is free to contribute ideas, time, > fix > things that are broken, ask questions, whatever. If I can help > anyone with > anything, please just ask. When I click Edit, a password dialogue tells me to Cancel to register, but then it 404s. I used TWikiGuest instead for now, but what did I do wrong? > A big part of the reason that the author guide documentation is > incomplete > is that there are still some unresolved issues. [...] Even creating and editing recipes? OK, fine. If no-one is doing those basic acts yet, the situation is not as daft as I thought. From the list traffic, it seemed that we were being left behind as a flurry of work was done. > My latest idea on this subject is in the topic > AdminCookbookViews. I can see the page, but how do I find other things in this category (if that's the same as what Twiki calls a topic)? Clicking the page title (which gives a list of linking pages on most wikis) doesn't work. > Using a proof of concept to communicate and possibly help move things > forward shouldn't be construed as "presenting a done deal". [...] As I wrote above, that wasn't the impression I'd got. This seemed like a full-blown charge off into the unknown rather than a scouting party. If the cookbook itself hasn't developed yet, or that development is being fed back into the schematics sources, then I'm sorry for getting jumpy and accusing you of railroading. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [email protected] Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click