Re: Hosting of the cookbook

On 2004-04-22 02:22:43 +0100 Francisco Solsona <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ummm... not so sure about the daft situation, but I can assure you
> that there are people working already on several (albeit basic)
> recipes. [...]

So what is going on? I am being told contradicting things again. This 
makes me unhappy.

1. If this is an active book already and people are charging off in 
the wrong direction, then fine, you go get on with it and I'll shut 
up, bypassed. Having explored what is there a little more, getting 
that answer now is the end for me. I'll go do something else useful 
instead while you create big deferred project and editing work. Run, 
run, run off the clifftops and good luck adjusting the flight as you 
go. Never know: it might just work.

2. If this is a proof of concept, then great, let's get the concepts 
right soon. Editing and release production (input and output) need 
simplifying to fit the stated "lightweight" aim. Basic project 
monitoring questions need more knowledge of what the system can 
produce than I have. I seem to get a bit stuck with the way this is 
strangely like a wiki, but not a wiki. "PureWikiFans" was definitely 
the wrong name for me to use, eh?

-- 
MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [email protected]
  Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click