Re: SchemeUnit: proposed syntax and perspective changes

--- Ryan Michael Culpepper <[email protected]> wrote:

> Writing a macro to correctly handle this syntax is not
> easy, and the
> current implementation is wrong (it breaks badly on
> macros that expand
> into test cases).

Yeah, it is a terrible hack, though I didn't expect it to
break as badly as it does.  Oh well. 

> The final approach is to eliminate special syntax and
> special notions of
> test prep and strike entirely and advice the users to
> write their own
> with-handlers and dynamic-wind expressions. We can move
> the concept out of
> the test framework into the tests, and then we can write
> regular
> abstractions (procedures and macros) over the common
> cases.

I'll have to think about it a bit more, but this strikes me
as the thing to do.  There is (still!) too much JUnit crud
in SchemeUnit.

Noel

=====
Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com
AIM: noelhwelsh


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click