Better? or less good?

Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle-qPpMuP/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.racket.user,gmane.lisp.scheme.plt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
    Dear Racket users,

    I noticed that Racket detects the variables used without any  
value. But let us consider the expression:

(or #t Gor)

    Since "or" evaluates as few arguments as possible, the result is  
#t, but this expression is rejected by Racket because "Gor" is  
unbound. So the rule would become: some arguments of "and" and "or"  
may be not evaluated, for example:

(and #f (/ 0))

but do not use this feature with unbound identifiers... From my modest  
point of view, that is not homogeneous... What do you think, please?

    Cheers,

J.-M. Hufflen


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected]
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.