Re: An alternative syntax for aux-list
Shiro Kawai <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:16:53 -1000 (HST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.scheme.ssax-sxml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ssax-sxml] An alternative syntax for aux-list Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:26:02 -0800 (PST) > The latter goes without saying. Absolutely there will be a migration > period -- once there is a general agreement that the migration is > worthwhile, that is. Potentially, it might be: the new format seems to > offer a degree a conceptual unification and might make SXPath > simpler. I can only say at this point that the proposal doesn't seem > to irreparably break anything. Do you think the proposal has merits > that offset the cost of changing the applications that do break? For our application, it is pretty early stage so it doesn't hold back the change at all. If the change makes things simpler, please go ahead. --shiro ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html