Re: [Sbcl-commits] master: Force copy+resize with mark-region-gc
Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:36:14 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF63=13FDM3BJqv=XK-Tk0_k2YzzXSo+6oEFKmyPE5_YbdnmdQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Unfortunately, it still sometimes doesn't move. I'm going to probably just make it skip the test if nothing moves. But it's still interesting, where is the randomness coming from? Nothing else is going on in the image. On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 10:26 PM Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> wrote: > > And loading pure tests in a single image probably also speeds testing > up, which is slow as it is on things like riscv, by loading test-utils > once. > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 6:46 PM Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > But then It becomes non deterministic, depends on the order of > > execution, hard to diagnose failures when running a single file. Does > > a different thing under parallel-exec.sh > > > > As to the whole .pure thing, running all tests in a single image does > > catch some stability issues. > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 6:43 PM Douglas Katzman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I view it as a feature, not a bug, that this test causes mark-region to move objects for all following tests. > > > If you disagree, can we eliminate the requirement for tests to state their intention to do no harm and just get the test runner to do the right thing by isolating tests like in any sane test framework? _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel