Re: Rename xmm-tn-p to float-register-tn-p

Stas Boukarev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel
Message-ID <CAF63=132ATz0AUjRf9DmBVZjSJx2zCdtgy-gNp-ca4z2fWPNjQ@mail.gmail.com>
I modified your patch to float-tn-p and applied it.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 8:37 PM Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think float-tn-p is a better name.
>
> > Another question: do you prefer patches, pull requests on GH, or just to
> > notify you when I have something? 🙂 I see you have applied
> > the GH branch, not the patch I send yesterday.
>
> That was just a diff, not a proper patch.
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 8:34 PM arthur miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to refactor an older function for Intel simd support.
> > Is that OK please? The reason:
> >
> > The name xmm-tn-p is a misnomer. The code checks whether a register is in
> > storage base for float registers which can be xmm, ymm, zmm, float, double,
> > complex float and complex double registers. While it is true xmm-tn-p asks if a
> > TN is in float registers SB, it also suggests we are differentiating between
> > ymm-tn-p, zmm-tn-p etc, which is not really the case here. It caused me a bug
> > and some investigation while working on mask registers support.
> >
> > Another question: do you prefer patches, pull requests on GH, or just to
> > notify you when I have something? 🙂 I see you have applied
> > the GH branch, not the patch I send yesterday.


_______________________________________________
Sbcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.