Re: change to standard-char-p in SBCL 2.4.2
Stas Boukarev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.steel-bank.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF63=11Ux7-jmW+Apt02-OnEJ-djppYp50HiojXHRF+8qPZ-9Q@mail.gmail.com> |
It seems to solve the problem of
(when (< (char-code x) 100)
x) ; => base-char.
but not in a general way.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 7:56 PM Douglas Katzman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 11:50 AM Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Is the better code only for the out-of-line function or does it have any
>> difference when inlined?
>>
>> If affects both. So while we could say that the full-called version
> returns a strict boolean (because the wrapper stub forces T/NIL), that
> would be really weird obscure policy-sensitive behavior
>
_______________________________________________
Sbcl-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-help