Re: change to standard-char-p in SBCL 2.4.2

Ok, I rectified that part.

On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 7:58 PM Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> wrote:

> It seems to solve the problem of
> (when (< (char-code x) 100)
>     x) ; => base-char.
> but not in a general way.
>
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 7:56 PM Douglas Katzman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 11:50 AM Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Is the better code only for the out-of-line function or does it have any
>>> difference when inlined?
>>>
>>> If affects both. So while we could say that the full-called version
>> returns a strict boolean (because the wrapper stub forces T/NIL), that
>> would be really weird obscure policy-sensitive behavior
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Sbcl-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-help