Re: defining foreign callbacks

Kenny Tilton wrote:
> Thx Kevin and now i see others for UFFI, I think it will prove to be a 
> seminal de-babelization for CL.
> 
> I just heard over on c.l.l. that CMUCL and SBCL do not support Lisp 
> callbacks from C. is that why UFFI does not cover callbacks. Or did I 
> just miss it? :)

Yes, Kenny, that's exactly why. I have not added any features to UFFI
that can not be supported on all primary platforms for UFFI.

-- 
       Kevin Rosenberg        |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  http://b9.com/debian.html   | : :' :      The  universal
  GPG signed and encrypted    | `. `'      Operating System
     messages accepted.       |   `-    http://www.debian.org/