Re: SQL on CMUCL/SBCL and Debian

Edi Weitz <[email protected]> writes:

> However, I'm not sure if packaging all this into one package is such a
> good idea. Many people just want the base functionality of CLSQL
> without the CLOS integration of USQL. I think it's better if there is
> a USQL Debian package which just depends on CLSQL.

Yah, I would agree with that, in my vague "I'm not even a lisp
programmer" way.

-- 
...Adam Di Carlo...<[email protected]>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>