Re: Lispworks and Oracle

Kevin Rosenberg <[email protected]> writes:

> I took the CMUCL-based oracle backed from USQL and have put in into
> the CLSQL distribution (http://clsql.b9.com/), but have not yet ported
> to it UFFI. But, it is packaged with and ready to go other than the
> FFI code.

I'm kinda suprised to hear that.  I thought the only linking you ever
did in CLSQL etc was using UFFI.  I guess not.

BTW, we are planning at some point to be able to use CL-USQL's
object/relational layer on top of CLSQL's data access layer, and at
that point, assuming all goes well, we'd get rid of most everything
under cl-sql/dbms.  But that's not our top priority, we haven't
established the internal API's necessary to do this yet.  Maybe some
day...

> It seems that the next db that CLSQL will be DB2.
> Currently, CLSQL supports ACL, LW, SBCL, CMUCL, SCL, and OpenMCL.

Nice.  I also notice you have done some thread-safing?  Is it
thread-safe, do you know?  Also, I'm curious, do you have an automated
testing regimen?

-- 
...Adam Di Carlo..<[email protected]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>