Re: time to fix known FLIM/APEL/SEMI problems

At Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:44:09 +0900, Kazuhiro Ito wrote:

> Possible solutions are below.
>=20
> (1) Make make-ccl-coding-system() to always define only LF EOL-type
> coding system.
> (2) Make make-ccl-coding-system() to accept optional argument and to
> be enabled to define LF EOL-type coding system explicitly, and make
> FLIM to define LF EOL-type coding system.
> (3) Make FLIM to define functional coding system with whichever EOL-type.
> (4) Make FLIM to use LF EOL-type coding system explicitly.=20
>=20
> My first patch takes (4), but I think it is ad hoc.  Second patch
> takes (1).  MORIOKA Tomohiko (maintainer of APEL) said he feeled (2)
> was better.

So, may be we'll do that in 2nd way?
=20
> > I can't read this thread in japaneese, translate.google.com also gives
> > up. Can anybody confirm that author didn't write about new problems
> > with that patch?
>=20
> I don't write any more about that problem except this message.=20

Ok, thanks
--=20
wbr, Vitaly