Re: time to fix known FLIM/APEL/SEMI problems

Hi.

> > Possible solutions are below.
> > 
> > (1) Make make-ccl-coding-system() to always define only LF EOL-type
> > coding system.
> > (2) Make make-ccl-coding-system() to accept optional argument and to
> > be enabled to define LF EOL-type coding system explicitly, and make
> > FLIM to define LF EOL-type coding system.
> > (3) Make FLIM to define functional coding system with whichever EOL-type.
> > (4) Make FLIM to use LF EOL-type coding system explicitly. 
> > 
> > My first patch takes (4), but I think it is ad hoc.  Second patch
> > takes (1).  MORIOKA Tomohiko (maintainer of APEL) said he feeled (2)
> > was better.
> 
> So, may be we'll do that in 2nd way?

I think emacs' version incompatibilities should be hidden by APEL, so
(1) and (2) are better than (3), (4).  But I don't know which (1 or 2)
is better.  If you choice (2), new FLIM loses compatibility with
present APEL.  So, new APEL must be released before (or at a time) new
FLIM is released.

-- 
Kazuhiro Ito