Re: [exim/exim] Spec, examples of different lookup syntax: if it shouldn't have read as suggested, it should explain why not (Issue #3216)

Why has this been closed? The references to "first kind" and "second kind" are fairly obviously swapped, assuming they are referring to the examples that follow the descriptive text.

If they refer to "first" and "second" elsewhere, that needs to be classified.

If they're not swapped, that too needs to be explained.

---
View it on Exim Forgejo ( https://code.exim.org/exim/exim/issues/3216#issuecomment-239538 ) or reply to this email directly.