gmane.mail.exim.devel

16033 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 21:22:59 +0100
minusbat via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16089
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:01:25 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16088
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:01:05 +0100
okryvulia via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16087
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:52:19 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16086
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:36:37 +0100
okryvulia via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16085
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:43:45 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16084
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:00:37 +0100
minusbat via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16083
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 09:45:00 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16082
[exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set aid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 21:17:56 +0100
minusbat via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16081
Re: [patch] Stop refering to (outdated) FSF postal address
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 11:32:37 +0200
Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16080
[exim/exim] [Bug]: Outdated license grant statements refer to outdated FSF addresses (Issue #3234)
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 10:31:09 +0100
ametzler via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16079
Re: [exim/exim] Remove NIS/NISplus support (Issue #3206)
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 10:04:31 +0100
toolsmith via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16078
Re: [Patch] Drop -lnsl from GNU/Hurd default LIBS.
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 09:53:35 +0100
Bernard Quatermass via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16077
[Patch] Drop -lnsl from GNU/Hurd default LIBS.
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:55:19 +0200
Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16076
Possible SMTP command line length conformance issue in Exim 4.99.4
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:30:54 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
曹博程 via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16075
Re: [exim/exim] local_from_check influences local and TCP submitted messages (Issue #1343)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:29:40 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16074
Re: [exim/exim] local_from_check influences local and TCP submitted messages (Issue #1343)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:29:40 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16073
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: the link is correct but its section number is wrongly displayed after html formating (Issue #3219)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:55:07 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16072
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: Example has a feature which is referred to as new, and discussed, a few sub sections afterwards (Issue #3218)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:54:08 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16071
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: the link is correct but its section number is wrongly displayed after html formating (Issue #3219)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:55:08 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16070
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: Example has a feature which is referred to as new, and discussed, a few sub sections afterwards (Issue #3218)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:54:07 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16069
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: host_lookup not applied for client addresses passed via proxy protocol (Issue #3221)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:52:45 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16068
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: ARC signature verification fails if one signed header name is a prefix of another (Issue #3222)
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:37:04 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
213220597--- via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16067
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: ARC signature verification fails if one signed header name is a prefix of another (Issue #3222)
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:50:26 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16066
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: ${utf8_domain_to_alabel:} does not validate result (Issue #3226)
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:03:23 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16065
Re: [exim/exim] Cross-compiling is broken (Issue #3170)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:02:26 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16064
Re: [exim/exim] ch-domain_host_address_and_local_part_lists.html#SECTlistexpand : Referring to 6.17 and 6.18 too, not just 6.20 and 6.22 (Issue #2719)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:59:47 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16063
Re: [exim/exim] Should have referenced the previous section, that is 10.15. Not the current one, which is 10.16 (Issue #2755)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:00:59 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16062
Re: [exim/exim] Should have referenced the previous section, that is 10.15. Not the current one, which is 10.16 (Issue #2755)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:00:59 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16061
Re: [exim/exim] ch-domain_host_address_and_local_part_lists.html#SECTlistexpand : Referring to 6.17 and 6.18 too, not just 6.20 and 6.22 (Issue #2719)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:59:46 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16060
Re: [exim/exim] expand protocol option on the smtp transport (Issue #2026)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:41:01 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16059
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:00:30 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16058
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 17:27:11 +0100
Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16057
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 01:45:50 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16056
Re: [exim/exim] expand protocol option on the smtp transport (Issue #2026)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 16:14:36 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16055
Re: [exim/exim] Need testcases for nisplus lookup (Issue #2212)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:06:45 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16054
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 09:25:02 +0100
Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16053
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:18:09 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16052
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 23:13:33 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16051
Re: [exim/exim] [PATCH] exim should not call arc4random_stir on FreeBSD (Issue #2304)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 23:10:34 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16050
Re: [exim/exim] [PATCH] exim should not call arc4random_stir on FreeBSD (Issue #2304)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 23:10:34 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16049
Re: [exim/exim] $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one (Issue #2987)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:47:50 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16048
Re: [exim/exim] $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one (Issue #2987)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:47:50 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16047
Re: [exim/exim] Distinct tags with same first letter overwrite each other (Issue #3056)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:46:05 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16046
Re: [exim/exim] Distinct tags with same first letter overwrite each other (Issue #3056)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:46:04 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16045
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: exim-be can't place $ in a tainted variable (Issue #3224)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:32:25 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16044
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: exim-be can't place $ in a tainted variable (Issue #3224)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:32:25 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16043
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Handling of mis-encoded RFC2047 parts in address headers (Issue #3232)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:29:23 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16042
Re: [exim/exim] Support RFC8460 TLS SMTP Report (TLSRPT) (Issue #3132)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 16:05:21 +0100
lucaat via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16041
Re: [exim/exim] Support RFC8460 TLS SMTP Report (TLSRPT) (Issue #3132)
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:17:41 +0100
AndrewAitchison via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16040