Re: Question Regarding RFC822 mime parts

Hubbard, Matt R W wrote:

> I was wondering whether this was intentional or not. The reason it came

It is :) The first treatment is for the "outer" part, in which the 
RFC822 message is stored. The second one processes the embedded message 
itself.

> I've worked around it with the following, so that an ACL of mine doesn't
> run on it on the first pass:
>   condition = ${if
> !match{$mime_content_type}{\N^message\/rfc822$\N}{1}{0}}

Shorter:

!condition = $mime_is_rfc822

But the two passes actually do slightly different things. Depending on 
what you want to achieve you might not want to skip.

cheers,

/tom