gmane.mail.exim.exiscan.user

2377 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: Exim, clamd, and spamd
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:00:05 +0100
Chris Lear <[email protected]> • #2404
Re: Exim, clamd, and spamd
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:53:57 +0200
Johann Spies <[email protected]> • #2403
Exim, clamd, and spamd
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:47 -0500
<[email protected]> • #2402
Announcing list closure
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:19:42 +0200
Tom Kistner <[email protected]> • #2401
Re: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:58:55 +0200
Alexander Ruhri <[email protected]> • #2400
Re: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:21:44 +0200
Tim Dijkstra <[email protected]> • #2399
RE: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Tue, 31 May 2005 14:45:04 -0400
"Frank DeChellis" <[email protected]> • #2398
Re: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Tue, 31 May 2005 19:52:35 +0100
Peter Bowyer <[email protected]> • #2397
Re: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Tue, 31 May 2005 19:19:18 +0100
Peter Bowyer <[email protected]> • #2396
RE: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Tue, 31 May 2005 13:36:44 -0400
"Frank DeChellis" <[email protected]> • #2395
Thoughts on conditional filter
Thu, 19 May 2005 14:09:03 -0500
Mike Oliveri <[email protected]> • #2394
Re: temporary defer all mail
Wed, 18 May 2005 21:35:51 +0100 (BST)
"Richard.Hall" <[email protected]> • #2393
Re: temporary defer all mail
Wed, 18 May 2005 14:57:20 +0100
Edward St Pierre <[email protected]> • #2392
Re[2]: temporary defer all mail
Wed, 18 May 2005 16:50:31 +0300
[email protected] • #2391
Re: temporary defer all mail
Wed, 18 May 2005 14:31:11 +0100
Edward St Pierre <[email protected]> • #2390
Re: Exiscan, Spamassassin, Cyrus and different Mailboxes for spam
Wed, 18 May 2005 12:25:25 +0100
Peter Bowyer <[email protected]> • #2389
temporary defer all mail
Wed, 18 May 2005 14:33:05 +0300
[email protected] • #2388
Exiscan, Spamassassin, Cyrus and different Mailboxes for spam
Wed, 18 May 2005 12:58:02 +0200
Angelika Goeszler <[email protected]> • #2387
[exim] Running with WITHOUT_OLD_DEMIME
Sat, 14 May 2005 00:53:33 +0300
"Odhiambo G. Washington" <[email protected]> • #2386
Re: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is un available.
Mon, 16 May 2005 16:54:43 +0100
Chris Lear <[email protected]> • #2385
Re: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is un available.
Mon, 16 May 2005 10:15:25 -0500
Mike Oliveri <[email protected]> • #2384
RE: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is un available.
Mon, 16 May 2005 10:02:16 -0400
"Ring, John C" <[email protected]> • #2383
Re: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Mon, 16 May 2005 11:07:58 +0200
Johann Spies <[email protected]> • #2382
Re: Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Fri, 13 May 2005 23:35:45 +0100
Peter Bowyer <[email protected]> • #2381
Do not issue temporary reject when spamd is unavailable.
Mon, 9 May 2005 20:04:18 +0000 (UTC)
John C. Ring, Jr. <[email protected]> • #2380
demime => MIME ACL equivalent
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:36:04 -0400 (EDT)
Mike Sturdee <[email protected]> • #2379
Re: WITH_OLD_DEMIME=yes
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:26:37 +0200
Juergen Edner <[email protected]> • #2378
RE: WITH_OLD_DEMIME=yes
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:27:48 +0200
"Michel Vanaken" <[email protected]> • #2377
WITH_OLD_DEMIME=yes
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:37:09 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> • #2375
Re: MIME Encapsulation Depth ?
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:15:20 +0100
Jerry Nicholls <[email protected]> • #2374
Re: MIME Encapsulation Depth ?
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:01:51 +0200
Tom Kistner <[email protected]> • #2373
MIME Encapsulation Depth ?
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:56:31 +0100
Jerry Nicholls <[email protected]> • #2372
Re: DSPAM
Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:50:40 +0200
Johannes Berg <[email protected]> • #2369
Re: DSPAM
Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:40:41 +0200
Johannes Berg <[email protected]> • #2367
Bug in sophie-3.04rc2
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:29:50 +0100 (BST)
Richard Gilbert <[email protected]> • #2366
Suse 9.1
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:33:31 +0100
"SH Solutions" <[email protected]> • #2365
Re: suse 9.1
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:38:55 -0500
[email protected] • #2364
Re: suse 9.1
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:47:27 +0100
Andreas Gietl <[email protected]> • #2363
suse 9.1
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:35:02 +0100
"Steffen Heil" <[email protected]> • #2362
Re: spamd & exiscan
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:59:48 +0000
Ricky Chan <[email protected]> • #2361
Re: spamd & exiscan
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:52:52 +0000
Ricky Chan <[email protected]> • #2360
Re: spamd & exiscan
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:45:34 +0000
Sujit Choudhury <[email protected]> • #2359
Re: spamd & exiscan
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:02:26 +0100
Adrian Woizik <[email protected]> • #2358
Re: spamd & exiscan
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:04:33 -0500
"Michael F. Sprague" <[email protected]> • #2357
Re: spamd & exiscan
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:24:22 +0000
Ricky Chan <[email protected]> • #2356
spamd & exiscan
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:13:02 +0000
Sujit Choudhury <[email protected]> • #2355
Re: scanning for NUL in messages
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:30:38 +0100
Claas Hilbrecht <[email protected]> • #2354
Re: scanning for NUL in messages
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:16:32 +0000
Tony Finch <[email protected]> • #2353
scanning for NUL in messages
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:32:28 +0100
Claas Hilbrecht <[email protected]> • #2352
Re: how to make 4.50 like 4.44
Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:24:12 -0500
Brian <[email protected]> • #2351