Re: Individual spam restrictions for mailbox

jzaw wrote:
 >
 > On Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004, at 09:45 Europe/London, Nick K. Kozubsky 
wrote:
 >
 >> I think, that antispam must move to ROUTERS CONFIGURATION of exim...
 >
 >
 > maybe not move there but have an option to additionally run it there
 >
 > the current setup of filter at smtp time has major anti collateral
 > damage advantages
 >
 > Zaw
 >
 >
 >
Of course you are right, it configuration is best. But I think now,
it's impossible to make individual spam restrictions in ACL.
May be I will try to set second spam-check into ROUTERS for each delivery...
Is this stupid? Or not?



nick

Rem:  No Microsoft products were used in the production of this message.